nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 02, v.35 48-54+68
主成分分析方法对电动汽车与燃油车声品质的主客观评价对比
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金资助项目(U1604141); 天津市科技计划项目(23KPHDRC00170)
邮箱(Email): xulong.wang@tute.edu.cn.;
DOI: 10.19573/j.issn2095-0926.202502008
摘要:

为揭示电动汽车与燃油车在噪声特征上的本质差异,通过量化分析不同车速下的噪声烦躁度值,构建科学的声品质评价体系。选取4款典型车型(2款纯电动汽车,车型为WE、ZE;2款传统燃油车,车型为QC、LC),在车速为60、80、100 km/h这3个典型工况下,以12个汽车噪声样本为研究对象,通过主客观评价方法对噪声烦躁度值的差异性、相关性和标准化处理进行分析。实验结果表明:响度与ASDM的相关系数最高,达0.974;电动汽车烦躁度值偏低,燃油车烦躁度值偏高;在3种不同工况下,将烦躁度由低到高排序,燃油车QC的烦躁度排名在前,电动汽车WE与ZE排名在中,燃油车LC排名在后。主成分分析方法能有效提取噪声特征的关键维度。

Abstract:

To reveal the essential differences in noise characteristics between electric vehicles(EVs)andfuelvehicles(FVs),a scientific sound quality evaluation system is constructed by quantitatively analyzing the noise annoyance values at different vehicle speeds. Four typical models(two EVs, models WE and ZE, and two traditional FVs, models QC and LC) were selected, and the differences, correlations and standardization of noise annoyance values were analyzed by subjective and objective evaluation methods with 12 vehicle noise samples under three typical working conditions, namely, 60, 80 and100 km/h. The experimental results show that: the correlation coefficient between loudness and ASDM was the highest,reaching 0.974; the annoyance values of EVs were low, while those of FVs were relatively high; and the annoyance values are ranked from low to high under the three different working conditions, with FV QC having the highest annoyance ranking,EVs WE and ZE in the middle, and FV LC having the lowest ranking. PCA(Principal Component Analysis) can effectively extract the key dimensions of noise features.

参考文献

[1] ABDELBAKY M,PEETERS J R,DEWULF W. On the influence of second use,future battery technologies,and battery lifetime on the maximum recycled content of future electric vehicle batteries in Europe[J]. Waste Management,2021,125:1-9.

[2] LI L X,WANG Z Q,CHEN L J,et al. Consumer preferences for battery electric vehicles:a choice experimental survey in China[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment,2020,78:102185.

[3] BORODENKO Y. Using the method of the spectral analysis in diagnostics of electrical process of propulsion systems power supply in electric car[J]. Przegl?ad Elektrotechniczny,2020,1(10):49-52.

[4] NARNE V K,JAIN S,BHARANI,et al. The effect of recreational noise exposure on amplitude-modulation detection,hearing sensitivity at frequencies above 8 kHz,and perception of speech in noise[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,2023,153(5):2562.

[5] HILLESHEIM D,SCHARLACH R C,DA SILVA E D,et al.Factors related to dizziness in workers with noise-induced hearing loss in Brazil[J]. American Journal of Audiology,2024,33(4):1135-1143.

[6] PARK J H,PARK H,KANG Y J. A study on sound quality of vehicle engine sportiness using factor analysis[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology,2020,34(9):3533-3543.

[7]徐中明,夏小均,贺岩松,等.汽车发动机启动声品质评价与分析[J].振动与冲击,2014,33(11):142-147.

[8]赖诗洋,夏小均,徐中明,等.汽车车窗升降声品质分析与评价[J].汽车技术,2018(7):48-53.

[9]杨攀.电动汽车电驱动系统声品质评价及预测方法研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2024.

[10]刘宁宁,李文静,王岩松,等.声品质主观评价方法对比分析[J].现代制造工程,2016(10):6-11.

[11]OTTO N,AMMAN S,EATON C,et al. Guidelines for jury evaluations of automotive sounds[J]. Sound&Vibration,2001,35(4):24-47.

[12]裴旭.基于声品质的噪声主动控制研究[D].镇江:江苏大学,2019.

[13]毛东兴,张宝龙.采用参考激励信号的语义细分法主观声品质评价[J].声学技术,2006,25(6):560-567.

[14]钱堃,刘珂,王言夫,等.电动汽车车内声品质评价研究进展[J].汽车工程,2024,46(8):1431-1446.

[15]孙登科,张鹏,王硕,等.基于响度的汽车声品质评价[J].汽车实用技术,2022,47(2):41-44.

[16]刘后广,赵禹,饶柱石,等.采用生理响度感知机制的车内噪声声品质预测[J].声学学报,2024,49(2):246-253.

[17]李勋,刘丽荣,李浩,等.基于PPG信号的极简特征回归树血压估计模型设计[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2024,41(6):769-775.

[18]谢丽萍,卢炽华,刘志恩,等.基于脑功能网络的内燃机汽车声品质评价模型[J].内燃机学报,2022,40(4):378-383.

[19]李浩,赵青,崔辰州,等.基于CNN与LSTM复合深度模型的恒星光谱分类算法[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2024,44(6):1668-1675.

[20]张亮.基于神经网络的摩托车声品质评价及其改进研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2010.

[21]约翰逊R A,威克恩D W.实用多元统计分析[M].陆璇,叶俊译,译.北京:清华大学出版社,2008.

[22] DIAZ D,MOLINA A,HAHN D W. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and principal component analysis for the classification of spectra from gold-bearing ores[J]. Applied Spectroscopy,2020,74(1):42-54.

基本信息:

DOI:10.19573/j.issn2095-0926.202502008

中图分类号:U461.4;U469.7

引用信息:

[1]牛祥,赵海军,崔新涛,等.主成分分析方法对电动汽车与燃油车声品质的主客观评价对比[J].天津职业技术师范大学学报,2025,35(02):48-54+68.DOI:10.19573/j.issn2095-0926.202502008.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(U1604141); 天津市科技计划项目(23KPHDRC00170)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文